Methods and apparatus for authenticating data as originating from a storage and processing device and for securing software and data stored on the storage and processing device

ABSTRACT

Techniques are described for using unique features of a storage medium for authentication of data as originating from the storage medium, and also for installing software and data to a storage medium in a way which inhibits unauthorized copying of the software and data to another storage medium. Cryptoprocessing keys are created using unique features of the storage medium such as location information related to storage of selected elements of a software installation on the storage medium, or alternatively defective block information relating to the storage medium. The cryptoprocessing keys are used to encrypt data for transmission to a remote server. The remote server uses the cryptoprocessing keys to decrypt the data and authenticates the data as having been encrypted with the correct keys. In order to control operation of software on a storage medium, location information unique to the storage medium is employed to create links between software modules comprising the software. If the software is copied to a different storage medium, the location information used in the links will be incorrect and the links between the modules will contain inaccurate information, preventing the software from operating properly. Location information unique to a storage medium can also be used to create cryptoprocessing keys for protection of data. If data encrypted using the keys is copied to a new storage medium, the location information in the new storage medium will not be the same as was used to create the original keys and the data will not be able to be decrypted at the new location.

CROSS REFERENCE

This application is a continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 09/562,333 filed May1, 2000 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,269,259 and incorporated herein in itsentirety.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates generally to improvements in datasecurity. More particularly, the invention relates to techniques forsecurely storing unique images of data and software on a storage medium.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The use of computers and other data processing equipment to processinformation and perform communication has been widespread for many yearsand continues to become more and more prevalent. Computers areincreasingly used to transfer private data, including data used toperform financial transactions involving significant sums. Privacy andauthentication is vitally important in such transactions. It is highlyundesirable for an unauthorized party to successfully imitate an ownerof a checking account or brokerage account and gain the opportunity toconduct unauthorized transactions.

Encryption is commonly used to protect information during transactionsconducted by computers, but encryption does not necessarily provideauthentication. Even in cases where the financial entity servicing theaccount authenticates itself through the use of a certificate, thecustomer owning the account is typically authenticated through the useof a username and a password. It is often possible for a skilledattacker to gain access to a user's private passwords and otherauthentication information. Such information may even be gathered byvarious Internet services which monitor a user's Internet activities inorder to provide services and conveniences for the user. Once thisinformation is gathered, it is subject to being attacked, and if theservice which gathered the information employs inadequate securityprecautions, private information of hundreds or thousands of users mayfall into the hands of unauthorized persons.

If a proper username and password are supplied, it is impossible for anentity such as a financial institution operating an online bankingservice or the like to know that the username and password were suppliedby an unauthorized user. Improved security procedures are sorely neededfor protection of customer financial and other transactions.

The typical computer presently in use possesses many unique features.Even computers from the same manufacturer and of the same model possessdiffering features, such as surface characteristics of hard disks andthe like. Once computers are placed into service, their characteristicsdiverge more and more, due to differing amounts of wear, different datawritten to and erased from the memory and hard disk and other featureswhich are altered by use, such as differences caused by differingfrequency of running of defragmentation programs and errors in storageof data, such as lost clusters and the like. If data could be extractedbased on the unique features of a computer, this data could be used toauthenticate the computer to a remote server or entity.

In addition, unique features of a computer or other data processingequipment could be used to provide control over software execution, orencryption of customer data. Many consumer applications involve the useof software in which the distributor gives physical possession of thesoftware media to a consumer, but wishes to continue to exert controlover the use of the software. This may occur, for example, when a vendorwishes to distribute a digital video disc (DVD) to a consumer and toallow only limited use of the disc, such as playing it only on a singleplayer or for a specified number of plays. Other applications involvethe use of software or data which is confidential in nature, such asconsumer credit or debit card information. It may be advantageous for aconsumer to have a database of credit card information stored on his orher own computer, but highly undesirable for someone else to be able tocopy that information and view or use it on a different computer.

There exists, therefore, a need in the art for techniques which employunique features of data processing systems to allow for authenticationof a computer or other storage medium, for installation of software ordata to a storage medium in a way which prevents proper operation if thesoftware or data is copied to another storage medium withoutauthorization, and for providing encryption for data installed to astorage medium, which will render the software or data unreadable ifcopied to a different storage medium.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

A system according to the present invention employs the unique featuresof a computer system or other data processing and storage system as asource of information for authentication and protection of data. Asoftware installation is made to a storage medium of a computer system.After the installation is made, a search is made for locationscontaining selected elements of the software installation. The contentsof these locations are employed to create cryptoprocessing keys. Duringan initial registration system with a remote server, such as a servercontrolled by a financial entity offering online banking services, thekeys are transmitted to the remote server through a secure connection,such as a connection employing public key cryptography using a keyemployed by the server. During subsequent communications with the remoteserver, the cryptoprocessing keys are used to encrypt information fortransmission to the server, such as date and time information and apassword supplied to the user. When the server successfully uses thecryptoprocessing keys to decrypt the transmitted information, the serverreceives a high level of assurance that the computer used in thetransmission is the original computer used for registration.

In addition to examining locations of elements of a softwareinstallation as a source of unique data, alternative techniques are alsopossible. For example, the typical computer hard disk has a number ofdefective blocks which are introduced during the manufacturing processand which are unique to the disk. These blocks are identified in amanufacturer's defective block table, supplied with the disk and uniqueto the disk. Data in the table may be used to create cryptoprocessingkeys which will identify the disk whose information was used to generatethe keys.

Some disks are adapted to be subjected to what is known as a stressread. This is a read operation in which tolerances are set tighter thannormal, so that even a number of good blocks are read as bad. Theresults of a stress read operation are likely to be unique to aparticular disk at a particular time. The results of a stress readoperation provide a good source of unique data which can be used tocreate keys.

In order to exert control over operation of software or access to data,a process according to the present invention includes constructingsoftware so as to use the specific locations where elements of thesoftware are loaded as information needed for the operation of thesoftware. When the software is installed, various program modules areplaced in selected locations in the storage medium. The modules arelinked to one another using location information relating to theparticular installation. If an attempt is made to install the softwareto a different location, the program modules will be installed todifferent locations due to differences between the computer hosting theoriginal installation and the computer hosting the new location. Thesedifferences may include differing amounts of installed memory, differingdisk sizes, differing data present in memory and disk, and the like. Itis highly unlikely that any two storage media will possess the samecharacteristics relating to available disk and memory space forinstallation, and for this reason installations to different storagemedia will differ in this regard. If the software is copied to a secondstorage medium, the links between modules will point to the originallocations, but the modules will no longer be present at the originallocations of the first installation.

Moreover, it is also possible to use unique data relating to a softwareinstallation to provide cryptoprocessing keys for data security. If asoftware installation is unique to a particular storage medium, largeamounts of data will be available which will be unique to the storagemedium. This data may be selected for use to create cryptoprocessingkeys which may be used to encrypt or decrypt data stored on the storagemedium. If the data is moved to a different storage medium, the dataused to create the cryptoprocessing keys will not be available in thecorrect locations on the new storage medium, and data which has beenmoved will not be able to be used or read.

A more complete understanding of the present invention, as well asfurther features and advantages of the invention, will be apparent fromthe following Detailed Description and the accompanying drawings.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 illustrates a storage and processing system suitable forperforming authentication according to the present invention and alsosuitable for receiving and executing a software image created andinstalled according to the present invention;

FIG. 2 illustrates a connection between a user-operated computer and aremote server adapted for authentication according to the presentinvention;

FIG. 3 illustrates a process for generating cryptoprocessing keysaccording to the present invention;

FIG. 4 illustrates a process for authentication of a user-operatedcomputer by a remote server according to the present invention;

FIG. 5 illustrates a prior art software image;

FIG. 6 illustrates an alternative prior art software image;

FIG. 7 illustrates a software image designed according to the presentinvention;

FIG. 8 illustrates a software image according to an alternative aspectof the present invention;

FIG. 9 illustrates a process of designing and installing softwareaccording to the present invention; and

FIG. 10 illustrates a process of cryptoprocessing employing locationfeatures of a software installation according to the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

FIG. 1 illustrates a computer system 100 suitable for receiving andexecuting a software image according to the present invention. Thecomputer system 100 includes a central processing unit (CPU) 102, diskdrive 104, memory 106, user interface devices such as a monitor 108 andkeyboard 110, removable storage device 112 and remote interfaces such asa modem 114 and network interface 116. The system 100 is adapted toreceive and store software and data on the disk drive 104 and memory 106or other storage media, placing the software and data in locationswithin the storage media according to protocols established in thedesign of the hardware and operating system employed by the system 100.In order to provide mechanisms for authentication, the computer system100 may receive a software image which is installed to the hard disk104.

A typical software installation is stored to the hard disk of a computerin a way which is not controllable by the user. Instead, installationproceeds automatically under the control of the computer's internalcontrol systems, such as the operating system and basic input/outputsystem. Depending on disk space available, elements of the softwareinstallation may be placed on various locations on the disk, withdirections to the locations being provided by data available in thecomputer's file allocation table or a similar indexing or mappingfunction. If the software installation is copied from one location toanother, it will be very difficult to duplicate the precise locations inwhich the software installation is placed. This phenomenon provides agood source of unique information which can be used to authenticate aspecific computer.

Thus, the installation of a software image to the hard disk 104 providesunique information which can be used to identify the computer system100. Upon installation of the software image, a search is made forlocations which contain elements of the software installation. Thecontents of selected ones of the locations are then used to generatecryptoprocessing keys.

As an alternative to generating cryptoprocessing keys by searching forinformation in locations occupied by a software installation, data foruse in generating processing keys may be obtained by examining themanufacturer's defective block table for the disk 104, or by performinga stress read operation on the disk 104 to generate a map or table ofblocks identified as defective. In either case, the defective blockinformation is used as data for the generation of cryptographic keys. Ifdesired, a combination of any or all techniques of using locationsoccupied by a software installation, manufacturer's defective blockinformation or defective block information identified as a result of astress read operation may be employed to generate keys.

The key generation may be performed according to any of a number ofwidely known key generation techniques. The scope of the presentinvention is not limited to any one procedure for key generation.

FIG. 2 illustrates a financial transaction connection 200 employing theprinciples of the present invention for authentication of a user'scomputer 202 to a server 204. The server 204 may suitably be a financialserver belonging to a financial institution offering online banking orother financial services. The computer 202 is similar to the computer100 of FIG. 1, and includes a hard disk 206 and remote interface 208.The computer 202 and the server 204 communicate over a connection suchas the Internet 210.

When a customer contacts the server 204 to register for online services,the server 204 transmits an executable authentication file to thecomputer 202. When the authentication file is installed, it is placed onthe hard disk 204 of the computer 202. The authentication file is placedin locations on the hard disk 204 in accord with the operating systemsand protocols employed by the computer 202. A search is then made forlocations containing selected elements of the authentication file.Location information for each of the selected elements is combined withthe data contained in selected locations to construct data for use ingenerating cryptoprocessing keys. The location information for theauthentication file is likely to be unique or nearly unique to the disk204, because the locations to which the selected elements are recordedwill be specific to the disk 204 because of characteristics such asamount of available space, locations of available space, defectiveblocks and other features. Moreover, placement of the authenticationfile is difficult or impossible for the user to control.

The derived from location information and other information relating tothe authentication file is used to generate one or more cryptoprocessingkeys using any of a number of techniques known in the art. The keys arethen stored on the hard disk 204 of the computer 202, and alsotransmitted to the server 206. Transmission of the keys is preferablyaccomplished using secure methods such as public key cryptography inwhich the server 206 provides authentication information to establishthe identity of the server 206. The server 206 also transmits a usernameand password to the computer 202, so that the user may employ theusername and password to identify himself or herself to the server 206.Alternatively, the server 206 may allow the user to choose a usernameand password.

When subsequent contact is made between the computer 202 and the server206, the authentication file is executed. The server 206 asks for entryof the username and password, and issues a request for authenticationinformation to the authentication file. The authentication file acceptsentry of the username and password and obtains time and date informationfrom an internal clock 212 in the computer 202. The authentication fileprepares an authentication package and encrypts the authenticationpackage using a previously created cryptoprocessing key. Theauthentication package is transmitted to the server 206 which decryptsthe authentication package using the key which was received during theregistration process.

As an alternative to using data relating to the authentication file forcreation of cryptoprocessing keys, it is also possible to use data fromthe manufacturer's defective block table for the disk 204, or to performa stress read operation on the disk 204 to produce defective block dataunique to the disk 204. Data produced by any or all of these techniquesmay be used to generate one or more cryptoprocessing keys. Creation anduse of cryptoprocessing keys operates independently from the techniqueschosen to generate data used to create the keys.

As an alternative to generating encryption keys and using the keys toencrypt an authentication package, it is also possible to use one ormore authentication codes to authenticate the computer 202 to the server206. An authentication code is preferably a series of numbers or otherdata relating to unique features of the disk 204, such as locationinformation of software, manufacturer's defective block table, ordefective block information resulting from a stress read operation. Ifit is desired to use authentication codes for authentication, thecomputer 202 produces the authentication codes during initialregistration with the server 206 and transmits them to the server 206.During subsequent communication with the server 206, the computer 202transmits the previously produced authentication codes to the server206. The server 206 retrieves the authentication codes previouslyreceived from the computer 202 during registration and compares themwith the authentication code received during the subsequentcommunication. If the authentication codes match, the computer 202 isauthenticated to the server 206.

FIG. 3 illustrates a process 300 for cryptoprocessing key generationaccording to the present invention. At step 302, a connection isestablished between a user-operated computer and a remote server. Atstep 304, a registration process is performed to establish terms andconditions by which the remote server will provide services and conducttransactions upon instructions received from the user-operated computer.At step 306, a software image is transmitted from the remote server tothe user-operated computer. The software image may suitably be anauthentication program adapted to perform operations for authenticatingthe user-operated computer to the remote server. At step 308, thesoftware image is installed to the user-operated computer. At step 310data relating to the installation of the software image is used tocreate an inventory of data unique to the user-operated computer for usein creating cryptoprocessing keys. The data may suitably include datarelating to locations in which selected elements of the software imageare stored, and the contents of the locations. Alternatively, aninventory of data may be created using the manufacturer's defectiveblock table for a hard disk in the user-operated computer, or as afurther alternative the inventory of data may be created using resultsof a stress read operation creating defective block information for ahard disk in the user-operated computer.

At step 312, the inventory of data is used to create one or morecryptoprocessing keys. At step 314, the one or more cryptoprocessingkeys are transmitted to the remote server.

FIG. 4 illustrates a process for authenticating a user-operated computerto a remote server according to the present invention. At step 402, aconnection is established between the user-operated computer and theremote server. At step 404, an authentication program is executed by theuser-operated computer. At step 406, upon entry of identifyinginformation by the user, such as a username and password, theuser-operated computer under control of the authentication programretrieves time and date information an combines it with the identifyinginformation to create an authentication block. At step 408, theuser-operated computer retrieves previously created cryptoprocessingkeys, created in a process such as the process 300 of FIG. 3, andencrypts the authentication block. At step 410, the user-operatedcomputer transmits the authentication block to the remote server. Atstep 412, the remote server retrieves previously receivedcryptoprocessing keys, received in a process such as the process 300 ofFIG. 3, and employs the keys to decrypt the authentication block. Atstep 414, the remote server examines the authentication block. If theauthentication block was decrypted correctly and contains correctinformation, the process proceeds to step 416 and the remote serverauthenticates the user-operated computer. If the authentication blockwas not decrypted correctly or does not contain correct information, theprocess proceeds to step 418 and the remote server rejectsauthentication of the user-operated computer.

In addition to performing authentication, it is possible to use theprinciples of the present invention to control installation andoperation of software or to provide a source of data forcryptoprocessing of private data stored on a user-operated computer orother processing and storage system. Software images are modified fromprior art software images in order to incorporate information specificto the particular installation in order to provide control overoperation and to provide a source of unique data for use incryptoprocessing.

FIG. 5 illustrates a software image 500 according to the prior art. Thesoftware image 500 includes first through fifth program modules 502-510.The program modules include links 512-518 between the modules 502 and510 so that each module successively links to the next module. Modules504-510 include entry points 520-526. As seen in FIG. 2, The firstmodule 502 includes the link 512 to the entry point 520 of the secondmodule 504. The second module 504 includes the link 164 to the entrypoint 522 of the third module 506, and so on to the entry point 526 ofthe fifth module 510.

Linking from one program module to another must be performed correctlyin order for the software image 150 to operate correctly. During aconventional installation of the software image 150, the links 512-518linking modules 502-508 to successive modules are identified with thelocations of the corresponding entry points 520-526 of the successivemodules 504-510 to which linking is being accomplished.

FIG. 6 illustrates an alternative software image 600 as installedaccording to the prior art. The software image 600 includes a mastermodule 602 containing calls to a series of subroutine modules 604-612.As processing by each of the subroutines 604-612 is required, the mastermodule 602 executes a link to the subroutine, such as the links 614-622.As each of the subroutines 604-612 finishes executing it links back tothe master module 602 using one of the return links 624-632. Each of thelinks 614-622 directs processing directly to the appropriate subroutine604-612 and the return links 624-632 direct processing directly to theappropriate point in the master module 602. When the software image 600is installed and executed, conventional mapping techniques are employedto translate the links 614-622 and the return links 624-632 to theappropriate memory locations where the various components of thesoftware image 600 reside.

FIG. 7 illustrates a software image 700 employing the techniques of thepresent invention. The software image 700 includes first through fifthmodules 702-710, respectively, installed in a storage medium 712. Thefirst through fifth modules 702-710 are not located contiguously withinthe storage medium 712, and do not contain direct links to one another.Instead, each of links 714-720 points to a location 722-728 containingan index 730-736, which in turn points to the entry point of thefollowing module 704-710. In order to provide added security, thelocation pointed to by the link is processed so that it must bereprocessed in order to establish a location for the module which isunique to the particular software image 700. For example, if the link714 comprises a pointer to a 32-bit address which is the address of themodule 704, the 32-bit address in the pointer is processed by performingan exclusive OR operation using the address and a randomly chosenconstant as arguments. The result of the exclusive OR operation isplaced in an index in the location indicated by the link 714, which inthis case is the location 722. Prior to program installation, the link714 may comprise a GOTO or GOSUB command with the address as anargument. Upon installation, the GOTO or GOSUB command is replaced witha GOTO INDEX or GOSUB INDEX command. The address pointer proceeds to thelocation 722, which contains the index 730. The index 730 contains theresult of the exclusive OR operation.

For example, if the link 714 to the module 704 contains the hexadecimaladdress 0140, the value 0140 may be subjected to an exclusive ORoperation with a randomly chosen value, for example 6131. This operationwould yield the hexadecimal value 6071, which is used as an index value.The hexadecimal value 6071 is placed in the location 722, which is thehexadecimal address 0140. The link 714 points to the index value 730contained in the location 722, or address 0140. This value is thehexadecimal address 6071, so that the link connects to the address 6071.

Upon installation of the software image 700, all of the links 714-720are assigned to indices 730-736 which have as contents results of XORoperations on the destination address indicated by the link and arandomly chosen constant. Each of the modules 704-710 which is linked toin this fashion is placed in the location indicated by the addresspointed to by the index 730-736. For example, the entry point of themodule 704 is placed in the location 6071, and similar placements areperformed for the remaining modules 706-710. If a generated addresslocation is occupied or otherwise unsuitable, the index is recomputedand placement is attempted until a successful placement is made.

An installation program used for installing the software image 700 maybe designed to refuse to allow an attempt to install the software image700 to another storage medium. This design is particularly easy toaccomplish if the software image 700 is distributed only in the form ofa download, because the installation program can be run remotely fromthe download site, so that the user who downloads the software image 700has no access to the installation program. If an attempt is made to copythe software image 700 to another storage medium, the links 714-720 willremain unchanged, but the various program modules will be located invarious locations in the new storage medium depending on what space isavailable and the rules for space allocation utilized by the new storagemedium. The program modules will not be in the locations pointed to bythe links, and proper operation will be impossible. It is possible todesign an installation program for installing the software image 700 toallow for multiple or consecutive installations, if desired, butunauthorized copying and use can be effectively prevented. This isbecause an installation program can be designed to keep track of thenumber of installations that have been made and perform a freshinstallation, creating new links between modules, the links employinglocation information obtained from the storage medium into which thefresh installation is being made. The installation program can bedesigned to refuse to operate if an attempt is made to perform aninstallation in an unauthorized manner. For example, the installationprogram can refuse to perform a fifth installation if it is designed toallow only four installations. Because each installation employslocation information specific to the storage medium into whichinstallation is made, it is difficult or impossible to circumvent theinstallation program by simply copying the installation into a newstorage medium.

While the software image 700 is illustrated here as comprising fivemodules 702-710, it will be recognized that the typical softwareinstallation comprises large amounts of code and large numbers ofmodules. For the typical software image constructed and installed in amanner similar to the software image 700, it would represent anexcessive burden for an attacker to modify each of the links so that thesoftware would operate properly when copied to a new storage medium.

FIG. 8 illustrates an alternative software image 800 employing thetechniques of the present invention. The software image 800 includes amaster module 801 which controls the execution of first through fifthsubroutine modules 802-810, respectively, installed in a storage medium811. The first through fifth subroutine modules 802-810 are not locatedcontiguously within the storage medium 811. The master module 801 doesnot contain direct links to the subroutine modules 802-810, and thesubroutine modules 802-810 do not contain direct return links to themaster module 801. Instead, each of links 812-820 points to a location822-830 containing an index 832-840, which in turn points to the entrypoint of the subroutine module 802-810. In order to provide addedsecurity, the location pointed to by the link is processed in order toestablish a location for the module which is unique to the particularsoftware image 800. For example, if the link 812 comprises a pointer toa 32-bit address which is the address of the module 802, the 32-bitaddress in the pointer is processed by performing an exclusive ORoperation using the address and a randomly chosen constant as arguments.The result of the exclusive OR operation is placed in an index in thelocation indicated by the link 812, which in this case is the location822. Prior to program installation, the link 812 may comprise a GOTO orGOSUB command with the address as an argument. Upon installation, theGOTO or GOSUB command is substituted for a GOTO INDEX or GOSUB INDEXcommand, where the address pointer proceeds to a location in the index832, which has as an argument the result of the exclusive OR operation.Upon installation of the software image 800, all of the links 812-820are processed to point to locations 822-830 containing indices 832-840which have as contents results of XOR operations on the destinationaddress indicated by the link and a randomly chosen constant. Each ofthe modules 802-810 which is linked to in this fashion is placed in thelocation indicated by the address pointed to by the associated one ofindices 832-840.

An installation program used for installing the software image 800 maybe designed to refuse to allow an attempt to install the software image800 to another storage medium. This design is particularly easy toaccomplish if the software image 800 is distributed only in the form ofa download, because the installation program can be run remotely fromthe download site, so that the user who downloads the software image 800has no access to the installation program. If an attempt is made to copythe software image 800 to another storage medium, the links 812-820 willremain unchanged, but the various program modules will be located invarious locations in the new storage medium depending on what space isavailable and the rules for space allocation utilized by the new storagemedium. The program modules will not be in the locations pointed to bythe links, and proper operation will be impossible.

While the software image 800 is illustrated here as comprising fivemodules 802-810, it will be recognized that the typical softwareinstallation comprises large amounts of code and large numbers ofmodules. For the typical software image constructed and installed in amanner similar to the software image 800, it would represent anexcessive burden for an attacker to modify each of the links so that thesoftware would operate properly when copied to a new storage medium.

FIG. 9 illustrates a process 900 for installing software to preventunauthorized use of the software when copied to a storage medium otherthan the original storage medium to which the software was installed. Atstep 902, a software image is established comprising a plurality ofsoftware modules. The software modules may include a series ofconsecutively executing modules, a master module controlling executionof a number of subroutine modules, or a combination of the types. Atstep 904, links are established between modules to control program flowbetween modules. At step 906, the software image is installed to astorage medium. At installation, the links between modules are convertedto pointers to indices with the indices pointing to particular locationsin the storage medium. The locations pointed to by the indices arepreferably generated through the use of randomly chosen factors. At step908, each module is placed in a location pointed to by its correspondingindex.

In order to provide security for private data stored to a storagemedium, it is possible to employ a software installation according tothe present invention for encryption of the private data. For example, acomputer user may wish to store a list of credit card information in adatabase stored on his or her computer, but may be reluctant to do sobecause of doubts about the security of the information. It would beadvantageous to employ a software installation according to the presentinvention to provide security for a database.

FIG. 10 illustrates a process 1000 for installing software according tothe present invention and employing location information relating to aspecific installation to provide encryption capability for data storedto the storage medium containing the software installation. At step1002, a software image is established comprising a plurality of softwaremodules. The software installation designed may suitably be a databasepackage. The software modules may include a series of consecutivelyexecuting modules, a master module controlling execution of a number ofsubroutine modules, or a combination of the types. At step 1004, linksare established between modules to control program flow between modules.At step 1006, the software image is installed to a storage medium. Atinstallation, the links between modules are converted to pointers toindices with the indices pointing to particular locations in the storagemedium. The locations pointed to by the indices are preferably processedthrough the use of randomly chosen factors. At step 1008, each module isplaced in a location pointed to by its corresponding index. At step1010, the software employed to receive and process information andcreate a database of the information. At step 1012, one or more of theindices pointing to a particular location in the storage medium isexamined to determine the location pointed to by the storage medium. Atstep 1014, the contents of each location are retrieved and used tocreate a cryptoprocessing key. At step 1016, cryptoprocessing on thedatabase contents is performed using the cryptoprocessing key.

The method described above provides security for database contents orother information stored on a computer or other storage medium, becausethe database is stored in an encrypted form. If the database is copiedto another storage medium, it will not be accessible because the keyused to encrypt it will not be present. If the database is copied toanother storage medium, along with the database program, the databaseprogram modules will not be in the correct locations and the databaseprogram will not operate correctly. Moreover, even if the key generationfeatures of the database program can be made to work, the correct keywill not be generated, because the contents of the memory locationswhich were examined to create the key will not be the same in the newinstallation, and the data used to create the original key will not bepresent. It will therefore be difficult for an unauthorized party tocopy the database to another storage medium for examination.

While the present invention is disclosed in the context of a presentlypreferred embodiment, it will be recognized that a wide variety ofimplementations may be employed by persons of ordinary skill in the artconsistent with the above discussion and the claims which follow below.

I claim:
 1. A system of authentication of a data processing and storagesystem, comprising the steps of: means for generating a cryptoprocessingkey based on unique features of data present in the data processing andstorage system; and means for using the cryptoprocessing key to processdata for transmission to a remote server in order to identify theprocessed data as originating from the data processing and storagesystem.
 2. The system of claim 1 further comprising a storage medium, anoperating system and a data storage protocol, wherein the means forgenerating a cryptoprocessing key comprises storing a software image tothe storage medium of the data processing and storage system in accordwith the operating system and data storage protocol and usinginformation relating to storage locations of selected elements of thesoftware image in order to generate the cryptoprocessing key.
 3. Thesystem of claim 1 further comprising a hard disk, wherein the means forgenerating a cryptoprocessing key comprises means for using informationrelating to defective blocks of the hard disk to generate thecryptoprocessing key.
 4. The system of claim 3 wherein the informationrelating to defective blocks is obtained from a manufacturer's defectiveblock table associated with the hard disk.
 5. The system of claim 3wherein the information relating to defective blocks is produced byperforming a stress read of the hard disk by the data processing andstorage system to generate defective block information.
 6. The system ofclaim 5 wherein the defective block information comprises a map or tableof blocks identified as defective by performing the stress read.
 7. Thesystem of claim 1 wherein said unique features comprise a combination ofat least two of: locations occupied by a software installation,manufacturer's defective block information, or defective blockinformation identified as a result of a stress read operation.
 8. Thesystem of claim 1 wherein said unique features comprise locationinformation for each of selected elements of an authentication filestored on a hard disk combined with data contained in selectedlocations.
 9. The system of claim 2 wherein the software image comprisesplural modules not stored contiguously within the storage medium. 10.The system of claim 1 further comprising a hard drive wherein saidunique features comprise storage locations occupied by an authenticationfile stored automatically under control of internal control systems ofthe data processing and storage system.
 11. The system of claim 1wherein said data is stored in locations of storage media according toprotocols established in design of hardware and operating systemsemployed by the data processing and storage system.